So when he does some more research he should admit he was wrong. You agree?
Moot means it’s not really the issue one way or the other.
If foreign ownership is moot, why did he bring it into the thread?
He’s trying I think to draw attention to the fact that people at the World Bank, the International Bank of Settlements, the European Central Banks and the Federal Reserve are connected and seem to follow orders from one authority.
For example the IMF and the World Bank have people that serve in both, and who meet with Fed Reserve people regularly and Federal Reserve people receive appointments from these foreign entities.
From the inside there is no foreign or non-foreign distinction. For example Henry Kissinger is a liason among several of these entities. The people that employ him may be Americans, or they may be European. But I think they are internationalists with no real country affiliation.
Of course this is not the important part of understanding how it is all tied together. The film has alot of professors, former IRS commissioners and agents, politicians, jurors, victims, esteemed authors, think tank
policy specialists, public interest researchers and more. The story script ties it all together so that you walk away understanding the big picture. There is nothing ‘goldbug’ about it. Everyone in the film is objective and not conspiracy driven.
It’s a very unifying film.
Near the end of the film the screen flashes in sequence:
Stop being a good democrat.
Stop being a good republican.
Start being a good American.
And after watching the film you’ll understand what the director means by this.
What is really important to understand is what’s in that film.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4312730277175242198