[Barset]

Can you refute any part of the time-line presented for the development of the hysteria surrounding this farce?

Is the history of the Clintons in their private and public lives so pristine that to wonder at their involvement in a situation that benefits them, while exacting revenge from an influential critic, is considered unreasonable?

I am surprised at your ad hominem attacks on those with whom you disagree.

[Pukin Dog]

You dont get it. I could come up with a timeline, using your logic, that Bill Clinton is the son of Hitler, given enough time. A timeline is not proof, and you should also look up the definition of ‘ad hominem’, a word thrown around here too often without correct association to events.