Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NittanyLion

Of course not, but it’s the unrelenting phony pressure from the likes of Al Sharpton that got them to that point. He doesn’t care what it does to weaken free speech. He just looks for his next shakedown.


282 posted on 04/11/2007 4:25:41 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies ]


To: leadpenny
How in heck are we gonna handle that 2-3 hours of napping in the morning? You know, in and out of the boring parts.

Help me, if you find something worth while.

297 posted on 04/11/2007 4:29:26 PM PDT by AGreatPer (IMPEACH PELOSI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

To: leadpenny
Should MSNBC be forced to keep Imus on the payroll even if they lose revenue as a result?

Of course not

You can stop right there. As soon as you said that, you acknowledged that my point is on the money. MSNBC retains the same rights Imus does, and in this case they exercised those rights. End of story, and there's no 1st Amendment impact here.

298 posted on 04/11/2007 4:30:34 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson