Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Froufrou

If Clinton hadn’t cut the standing force to 10 Divisions from 18, there wouldn’t be such a stress on the military.


3 posted on 04/11/2007 12:19:27 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Parmy
"If Clinton hadn’t cut the standing force to 10 Divisions from 18, there wouldn’t be such a stress on the military."

Obviously Clinton should not have been elected in 2000.

5 posted on 04/11/2007 12:23:32 PM PDT by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Parmy

Thank you very much! Maybe we shoulda kept him an endless supply of interns! Or fewer of them...?


12 posted on 04/11/2007 12:28:01 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Parmy

Bingo. This is entirely CLinton’s fault, and we should never let them forget it.


18 posted on 04/11/2007 12:32:19 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Parmy

I was at several division closings under GHWB (41).
This started before Clinton was in office and was called the “peace dividend” well before Clinton was elected.


23 posted on 04/11/2007 12:34:45 PM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Parmy
If Clinton hadn’t cut the standing force to 10 Divisions from 18, there wouldn’t be such a stress on the military.

I'm not defending him - he certainly gutted the military, but quite a few cuts were being planned and made before he took office. What disturbs me is that the current administration doesn't seem to want to increase the size of the military - after 9/11, I expected a fairly large increase.

Either way, the news of the 15 month deployments should not be news at all - the administration should be able to put troops in there for 24 or 36 months, or however long is needed to get the job done. The media is going to go out of their way to find somebody who whines about the 15 months, I'm sure.
43 posted on 04/11/2007 12:48:15 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Parmy

How many times does it have to be said, the peace dividend cuts started under GHWB and would have continued under who ever was elected in 92. It’s irrelevant anyway. Clinton has not been the Commander (in chief) for over six years.


58 posted on 04/11/2007 1:00:38 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson