To: farlander
Duhhhh, when anybody wins a major lottery prize isn’t actually awarding the prize conditional on letting the lottery people publicize the winner’s name, face, and address all over creation?
To: HiTech RedNeck
Yep. So you change your looks for the appearances.
And you hire some good lawyers and accountants. . .
40 posted on
04/09/2007 4:04:35 AM PDT by
Salgak
(Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
To: HiTech RedNeck; farlander
Duhhhh, when anybody wins a major lottery prize isnt actually awarding the prize conditional on letting the lottery people publicize the winners name, face, and address all over creation? Not here in Oklahoma. A recent big winner (>$100k) followed the advice in farlander's post just before yours (lawyers, blind trusts, etc.). Really cheesed off the media...some have pushed for a change in the law. I think they should keep it as is so the winners have the choice of the level of publicity desired.
47 posted on
04/09/2007 5:01:38 AM PDT by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Duhhhh, when anybody wins a major lottery prize isnt actually awarding the prize conditional on letting the lottery people publicize the winners name, face, and address all over creation? Yes it does. The state lotteries have to maintain the happy-ever-after fiction in order to sell the tickets. They need to publicize the winners so they can draw in more suckers.
57 posted on
04/09/2007 5:52:42 AM PDT by
gridlock
(On January 20, 2009, Fred Dalton Thompson will be sworn in as President of the United States.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson