[FastCoyote]

“All those are fine here but only Mormons are to be singled out? I don’t think that is management’s intent.”

Not every Mormon, just the one running for president of the United States who will have his finger on the nuclear button and lead our troops to battle. Seems like a presidential candidate might be open to scrutiny. And I’ve also written more than you will know about Harry Reid’s problems at great personal risk.

But let’s just live in a bubble and believe the fair and balanced Democrats will never bring up any of the questions I’ve raised.

[George W. Bush]

And I’ve also written more than you will know about Harry Reid’s problems at great personal risk.

And we appreciate it. But Reid is corrupt and therefore dangerous because he is a Dim party boss in a state dominated by corrupt gambling interests, not because he's a Mormon. I think Reid could not survive an election in Utah. But Romney would walk away with it.

I'm not sure how you can tie Harry Reid to Romney.

Perhaps you don't recognize that from a conservative political standpoint, just as Scalia is a good Catholic and conservative, Teddy Kennedy and Rudy Giuliani are not? And that Harry Reid is a bad Mormon (and a corrupt Dim party boss in a corrupt state) and Romney is a generally wholesome and successful businessman? Reid is something they put up with. Romney is someone they're proud of. You should be able to see the difference between the two.

Now, if he's just too liberal, then oppose him for that. And maybe he is. I haven't decided yet.