Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
"A strict constructionist judge can come to either conclusion about Roe against Wade," he said.

Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. Any glint of hope I had that Rudy at least understood the Constitution has now disappeared. Sounds like another, 'that depends on what the definition of is, is' moment to me.

5 posted on 04/04/2007 7:13:28 PM PDT by rintense (I'm 4 Thompson!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: rintense

Some of us pointed out months ago that Rudy’s pledge to appoint “strict constructionists” should not be taken seriously by conservatives. After all, this is a guy who thought Ruth Bader Ginsburg was a fine lawyer deserving of a Supreme Court position. He’s just another liberal elitist who admires others of the legal profession. He has no fixed principles. He is not a conservative by any definition.


14 posted on 04/04/2007 7:22:53 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rintense

Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. Any glint of hope I had that Rudy at least understood the Constitution has now disappeared.

At least he’s consistently wrong on Constitutional issues. Ask him what he thinks about the Kelo decision.


28 posted on 04/04/2007 7:48:00 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rintense

Your hate towards Giuliani has become irrational. What do Giuliani’s abortion positions have to do with the constitution? Today we need to worry about terrorism, not aboriton. And who better than Giuliani to fight those who want to harm us.


122 posted on 04/04/2007 9:02:11 PM PDT by terminatorsmithster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson