Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani stands by support of publicly-funded abortions
CNN ^ | 4/4/07 | Staff

Posted on 04/04/2007 7:07:11 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky

TALLAHASSEE, Florida (CNN) -- Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani told CNN Wednesday he supports public funding for some abortions, a position he advocated as mayor and one that will likely put the GOP presidential candidate at odds with social conservatives in his party.

"Ultimately, it's a constitutional right, and therefore if it's a constitutional right, ultimately, even if you do it on a state by state basis, you have to make sure people are protected," Giuliani said in an interview with CNN's Dana Bash in Florida's capital city.

-

Giuliani also vowed to appoint conservative judges to the bench, though denied such a promise was a "wink and a nod" to conservatives in support of overturning Roe v. Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision on abortion.

"A strict constructionist judge can come to either conclusion about Roe against Wade," he said. "They can look at it and say, 'Wrongly decided thirty years ago, whatever it is, we'll over turn it.' [Or] they can look at it and say, 'It has been the law for this period of time, therefore we are going to respect the precedent.' Conservatives can come to that conclusion as well. I would leave it up to them. I would not have a litmus test on that."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortiani; abortion; giuliani; rinorudygiuliani; rudy; rudyonabortion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last
To: jveritas

Like Reagan said. If someone only agrees with you 80%, they are definately not against you.


41 posted on 04/04/2007 8:00:39 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Pro lifer for Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zerosix
Why, Mitt was not very long ago in the exact same position as Rudy?

When did Mitt Romney ever say tax payers should pay for abortions? In his entire political career he as only acted on the pro-life side.
42 posted on 04/04/2007 8:01:06 PM PDT by msnimje (True Conservatives will not support a pro-abortion candidate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

Are you EV’s other screen name? I don’t anybody who would praise such a demented idjit so openly but himself.


43 posted on 04/04/2007 8:01:58 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

No doubt. However people tend to go with someone they agree with 90% of the time rather than the one they agree with 80% of the time.


44 posted on 04/04/2007 8:03:01 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
But he has to pay the earthly price for his crime anyway.

Earthly price?

What, Duncan Hunter's going leap out from behind his asterisk and give Romney a wedgie?

45 posted on 04/04/2007 8:04:10 PM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Romney campaigned from the left, but governed from the right despite an opposition party with an overwhelming majority.

I had a client in my office today who described himself as a liberal Democrat from Massachusetts who ended up working for Paul Cellucci’s adminstration. He said he had a high opinion of Romney in his first year in office, but soon became disenchanted with him when he started governing as a social conservative.

If Romney was disappointing social liberals in Massachusetts while he served as governor, then that ought to tell you something about the man’s political ideology. He’s a fiscal conservative, and social conservative...no matter how he portrayed himself in 2002 during a campaign.

He’s smart, articulate, good-looking, and has high morals and ethics. He is also incredibly accomplished in life, and would make an excellent President.


46 posted on 04/04/2007 8:04:10 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
He's very pro-life, as evidenced by his marriage and family life.

So, those fifty million dead American babies mean nothing to you I take it. Four thousand more of them died today, their killers empowered by politicians like Romney and Giuliani.

47 posted on 04/04/2007 8:04:18 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

I am pro-life. but here we are in the middle of a struggle in Iraq. The War on terror is just beginning. The Dems are proposing tax increases.

I want a strong leader. I see Rudy as “THE GUY”


48 posted on 04/04/2007 8:05:44 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Pro lifer for Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bw17
but governed from the right

Baloney. On Romney's watch, MA got gay marriage, the homosexualization of the public schools, socialized medicine, an "assault weapons" ban, and more Dems and Independents appointed to the bench than Republicans...including radical gay activists.

49 posted on 04/04/2007 8:06:36 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

You’re deceived. Liberals may talk tough on national defense, but they always end up as appeasers in the end. Never fails.


50 posted on 04/04/2007 8:07:34 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Really? Well how many of those “liberal views” translated into liberal governance?

He has LIVED the life of a conservative for crying out loud! There is nothing in his life that is “liberal” in any way, shape, or form.


51 posted on 04/04/2007 8:07:39 PM PDT by bw17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

The move is bad or good depending on which way you spin it. It’s bad for his prospect in Southern states in the primaries, but good for blue states in primaries, and good for an eventual electoral race vs. a Democrat in ‘08.


52 posted on 04/04/2007 8:07:45 PM PDT by terminatorsmithster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: msnimje

Mitt didn’t every SAY taxpayers should pay for killers to kill babies, he merely had no problem with it.


53 posted on 04/04/2007 8:08:18 PM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative

Barry Goldwater would be too liberal for the current republican party. Isnt that a sad thing ?

Not really, we’ve had 40 years to evaluate liberal policies since then. Some of the seeds planted in the sixties are just now bearing fruit. Now we know better.


54 posted on 04/04/2007 8:08:36 PM PDT by freedomfiter2 (Duncan Hunter '08 Pro family, pro life, pro second Amendment, not a control freak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Your support for Romney is warping your soul.


55 posted on 04/04/2007 8:09:07 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
So, those fifty million dead American babies mean nothing to you I take it. Four thousand more of them died today, their killers empowered by politicians like Romney and Giuliani.

More hysterical outbursts like yours will certainly will certainly lead the country to the fetal promised land....not.

56 posted on 04/04/2007 8:09:12 PM PDT by zarf (Her hair was of a dank yellow, and fell over her temples like sauerkraut......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani told CNN Wednesday he supports public funding for some abortions

WRONG answer Rudy

57 posted on 04/04/2007 8:09:21 PM PDT by Mo1 ( http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

so long as Roe is the law of the land - what can you do? what are you going to tell poor women who get medical care through public assistance?


58 posted on 04/04/2007 8:09:43 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles
Absolutely NOT. I merely love the term "Eternal Vigilance is the price of freedom."

Sorry to have raised the hackles on the back of your neck or whatever (have a nice day.)

59 posted on 04/04/2007 8:09:44 PM PDT by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Rudy is not a liberal. He is for keeping tax cuts. He is for a strong military. He has strong leadership qualities.

I believe Reagan would support Rudy, just as he did Barry Goldwater, even though they were not eye to eye on every issue.


60 posted on 04/04/2007 8:10:05 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (Pro lifer for Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson