Because you quoted only part of that statue, and left off a very significant part:
Related to question of prohibitions based on age is the legality to of “age-restricted active adult (55 years and older) communities”. The answer is that Fair Housing Act, Section 3607, provides an exemption for these types of communities, making them legal if certain criteria are met. For an “age-restricted community” to qualify under this exemption, it must have eighty (80%) percent of its units occupied by at least one person whom is fifty five (55) years or older, the community must publish and strictly adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate the intent required under Section 3607 (i.e., intent to restrict housing to individuals over age 55), and the community must comply with the rules issued by the federal and state officials for verification of occupancy.In other words, PAR35, this household with child has NO, ZERO, ZILCH, NADA, NONE WHATSOEVER effect on whether the community falls under age-restricted regulatory definition. Go peddle your jokes to some other peanut gallery.(Source: Elysa Bergenfeld of Stark and Stark, http://www.njlawblog.com/elysa-d-bergenfeld.html
Obviously, you have either reading comprehension issues or other problems. You managed to pass a bar exam? Get someone to read post 332 to you and explain it.