>> There is no way I’d enter into a business relationship with a person who feels that contracts can be dishonored at will.
Good and you shouldn’t.
>> Yes, I am suggesting that such an attitude shows a lack of charecter.
When the issue involves the means and domicile of the grand parents to care for the child in discussion, the community contract is something that can and should be challenged in a court of law. Your emphasis on honor and character is misplaced and is but something for you to squawk about.
If you were the caretaker of this child and were financially locked into that community, how would you demonstrate honor and character?
If you can't sell your nice house, you rent it for market rates, and you rent a small apartment to live in.
that can and should be challenged in a court of law.
You are familiar with the Housing for Older Persons Act, aren't you (42 USC Sec 3607 (b)) which specifically exempts age restricted communities from fair housing laws, aren't you?
And since such communities may have received special treatment for school impact fees, if the community loses its classification as an age restricted community, there might be a financial burden placed on the homeowners. See generally Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, LP