Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JamesP81
I want to make something clear, just so we can prevent the mincing of words. Most here are advocating removing a child from her family and placing her in foster care, for the sake of money. I want everyone to remember that clearly.

James, you usually set a higher standard than this...shame on you. These people are not advocating anything for anybody...they are resisting having what is the grandparent's problem become the neighborhood's problem.

No-win situations happen all the time; that's life. It's become increasingly popular for some to create them, then throw themselves upon the mercy of strangers.

It's not "about the child," and it's not "about the grandparents." It's about a neighborhood.

Covenants are a legally enforceable contract. We've all made commitments that we later regretted; it's not the fault of the person who signed the contract with us.

If you don't like HOAs, DON'T BUY A HOUSE IN ONE! And, if you do...don't try to rewrite the rules, retroactively. Three years is long enough; it's too long.

198 posted on 04/03/2007 9:17:51 AM PDT by gogeo (Democrats want to support the troops without actually being helpful to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: gogeo
Covenants are a legally enforceable contract.

So might have said Supreme Justice Taney in 1856, Dred Scott v. Sandford! Well, then count me as a Republican, as the current Wikipedia entry says:

Democrats characterized Republicans as lawless rebels, provoking disunion by their unwillingness to accept the Supreme Court's decision as the law of the land.

200 posted on 04/03/2007 9:27:38 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson