Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman
Annual Review of Anthropology
Vol. 34: 207-30 (Volume publication date October 2005)
(doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.030905.154913)

First published online as a Review in Advance on June 14, 2005

EARLY MODERN HUMANS

Erik Trinkaus­
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130; email: trinkaus@wustl.edu

Perceptions of the emergence and spread of modern humans have changed recently through the reanalysis of fossils, an improved geochronological framework, and the discovery of a few specimens.
Early modern humans in various portions of the Old World exhibit complex and varying mosaics of archaic, modern, and regional morphological characteristics. On the basis of this pattern, in conjunction with the emerging chronology of the earliest modern humans, the paleontological data indicate an assimilation model for modern human origins, in which the earliest modern humans emerged in eastern Africa, dispersed briefly into southwestern Asia, and then subsequently spread into the remainder of Africa and southern Asia, eventually into higher latitude Eurasia.
The earliest modern humans outside of the core area of eastern Africa can be understood only if a variable degree of admixture with regional groups of late archaic humans occurred. Current and expected fossil and molecular data are unlikely to illuminate the degree of assimilation that took place in most regions of the Old World.
However, the current chronological and phylogenetic framework provides the basis for ongoing investigation of the nature of this Late Pleistocene transitional period.

17 posted on 04/02/2007 9:29:08 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: blam
The earliest modern humans outside of the core area of eastern Africa can be understood only if a variable degree of admixture with regional groups of late archaic humans occurred.

The multiregional idea is what I learned in grad school, many years ago. I have been partial to it ever since.

19 posted on 04/02/2007 9:32:42 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson