I said your position implies, nothing more, nothing less.
If you can't see that the statement is completely relevent in addressing the point you are making, perhaps you shouldn't venture out and hold your arguments for others to view.
[edit] U.S. Senate Votes By Fred Thompson
OnTheIssues.org -Important Votes by Thompson[13]
"yes" on allowing more H-2A visas for foreign agricultural workers
"yes" on H1-B and H1-Cvisas for skilled foreign workers
"yes" on renewing 'fast track' presidential trade agreements authority
"yes" on permanent normal trade relations with Communist China
"yes" on expanding trade to the third world
"yes" on granting normal trade relations status to Vietnam
"yes" on extending free trade to Andean nations
"no" on reducing marriage penalty instead of cutting top tax rates
"yes" on prioritizing national debt reduction below tax cuts
"no" on more penalties for gun and drug violations
"no" on $1.15 billion per year to continue the Community Oriented Policing Services program
"no" on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation (Bill S.625 2002)
"no" on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes (Bill S.2549 2000)
"yes" on killing restrictions on violent videos to minors
"no" on removing common goods from national security export rules
"yes" on reducing funds for road-building in U.S. National Forests
"yes" on defunding renewable and solar energy
"no" on ending discussion of Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards
"yes" on preserving budget for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge oil drilling
"yes" on confirming Gale Norton as United States Secretary of the Interior
"yes" on terminating Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards within 15 months