Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFreeBird

My point is that his implications are deliberately misleading. He is implying Iran is doing this because of the Royal Navy. That is rubbish.

He is also implying that there is something strange with the UK having only the 28th largest army in the world. That is not new. Even when Britain ran 650 million Indians they did so with less than 20,000 people.

Vietnam and Iraq show that even America struggles to invade nations, do why would the UK have an army big enough to pretend it could do that?

Britain should have a capability to defeat terrorism, win flashpoints or destroy a nation completely. I think that is the policy they are looking at.


34 posted on 03/31/2007 12:38:56 PM PDT by Jack_Macca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Jack_Macca
I didn't see anything in the article (a transcript really) that implied that Iran did this to Britain because of a weakened Royal Navy.

He was speculating on what Blair could do with a navy that is considering cutting its fleet in half to 22 ships. I believe he was also commenting on the fact that while the EU is cutting its defenses, the enemies of civilization are strengthening their military capabilities and that that is not a good thing.

So while you are saying that the conservative Telegraph is trying to scare the people into supporting a strong navy/military, perhaps Fred is trying to do the same to other western nations that seem hell bent on suicide.

Lets face it, the EU is a hand wringing, pantywaist of an organization that would rather let itself be overthrown from within or without because they can't stand the idea of growing a spine and saying: ENOUGH! And then to back it up with serious action.

Appeasement didn't work in 1939, and it isn't going to work today. Especially with the mad man running Iran, and his quest for the bomb.

So I guess what I get from the article about Fred is; that he subscribes to the philosophy of:


49 posted on 03/31/2007 1:12:08 PM PDT by AFreeBird (This space for rent. Inquire within)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Jack_Macca
It ain't then it is now. You people are surrendering for electoral advantage, keep the troubles away and we have another run at Peace In Our Time.
63 posted on 03/31/2007 2:07:58 PM PDT by Little Bill (Welcome to the Newly Socialist State of New Hampshire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Jack_Macca
No he is not implying that Iran is doing this because of the British Royal Navy being downsized. You are making the wrong conclusion from Fred Thompson article. He is saying that the British government is showing a lot of weakness toward the evil terrorist islamic regime in Tehran, and on this regard he is absolutely correct.

You guys in Great Britain need to tough it up and fight, a great number of people in the US are shocked by Britain weakness in this crisis.

71 posted on 03/31/2007 2:19:24 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Jack_Macca

So what's your contention? The British Navy has suffered no real cuts in funding or effectiveness? It is as strong as it has ever been?


119 posted on 04/01/2007 8:18:13 AM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson