Posted on 03/31/2007 11:42:51 AM PDT by DBCJR
Tony Blairs getting angrier every day. But if past Iranian hostage takings are an indication, he may be upset for a while. The American-embassy hostages were held for 444 days, and the Israeli soldiers kidnapped last year by Irans Hezbollah puppets still arent free.
Blair is threatening to escalate to a different phase, but Irans leadership knows something that most Americans dont. Two months ago, Britains government announced plans to mothball almost half its naval fleet due to defense-budget cuts. Much of its existing navy is already so degraded; it would take over a year to get into action. According to the British newspaper, the Daily Telegraph, senior naval officers say that the cuts will turn Britains once-proud Navy into nothing more than a coastal defense force.
In fact, the British naval forces have been so neglected; the U.K. probably couldnt pull off the Falkland Islands mission today. The worlds fifth-largest economy now supports an army that ranks 28th in size.
What are they thinking?
Continued below
(Excerpt) Read more at article.nationalreview.com ...
"I do agree with your tactic of the US President stating clearly how we are prepared to help. In so doing, are we not also suggesting courses of action? Would that not be extending our wisdom?"
We can only offer to help in the use of force. The US has apparently rolled up some 300 Iranian agents in Iraq and part of this is about them wanting a trade. We cannot get sucked into the Israeli style trading of 100s of terrorists for their solders so force is the only option we can support.
Does that make sense?
W
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.