Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery; Sherman Logan
Agnosticism is an intellectually defensible position. Atheism is not.

Depends on your definition of 'atheism.' If by atheism you refer to militant atheism, where the possibility that any sort of deity might exist is denied in principle, then you are correct. But that definition of atheism is a strawman lacking any utility, since few 'atheists' are actually that dogmatic and closed-minded.

If a self described "atheist" is not 100% certain that there is no God then, by definition, he is an agnostic.

Being a true atheist requires more blind faith than was shown by St. Thomas.

146 posted on 04/01/2007 7:15:43 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Polybius
If a self described "atheist" is not 100% certain that there is no God then, by definition, he is an agnostic.

Sir, I have the right to define both what I believe, and the term to be used to describe that belief. Just as do you. I don't tell you what term to use to describe your belief, philosophy or religion, and I expect you to accord me the same courtesy.

147 posted on 04/01/2007 9:51:51 AM PDT by sourcery (Government Warning: The Attorney General has determined that Federal Regulation is a health hazard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson