That's not good logic.
"In order for there to be nothing, there must be a distinction."
No. If there is nothing, then that's all there is. It's called the empty set. The quantity of all things that exist is zero.
"The fundamental principle of existence is the distinction."
Distinction is a concept, and regards the fact that individual things that exist can be differentiated. Distinguiability occurs when the first thing other than nothing exists.
Whose existence?
The establishment of a Supreme Being precedes your accusation that there is not, going back thousands upon thousands of years.
1 + 1 does not equal 2. Prove to me that it does, then prove to me that the number "2" is the correctly applied name for the result of 1 + 1.
Existence is, and always has been. There is no creation, only change and transformation.
Then how do you explain motion? Motion doesn't create energy. It receives energy from its mover. If there's no first mover, there's no energy. If there's no movement, there's no time. There can be no change or movement (time) without an external force that sets it in motion.
Nothing is not a possible state of existence globally
Which is why before the universe was created by God, there was void. Since God is not a corporeal being, void is not evidence against the eternal existence of the first mover.
There is no transitive closure to that sequence of questions and answers--which is why reality must be eternal.
Reality is limited only to what man can sense or reason? Wow. Is gravity a reality?