Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jonascord
If I recall, there was a Navy psychologist who was writing his Doctorate thesis, and, like all liberals who like to get freebies, figured that the Marines on base at MCB 29 Palms were put there for his personal research.

Pretty close. The questionaires were devised by a Lt. Cdr. Guy Cunningham, USN as part of the requirements for his Masters Degree program at the Naval Postgraduate School, Montery, California; see the link in my post #17 above for a full copy of the survey questions.

But it did not help still the resulting furore that on May 3, 1994, President Clinton signed a Presidential Decision Directive establishing "U.S. Policy on Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations". For an overview of the unclassified portions of PDD 25 go to the PDD 25 Summary *here*.

18 posted on 03/30/2007 1:56:41 PM PDT by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: archy; neverdem
President Clinton signed a Presidential Decision Directive establishing "U.S. Policy on Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations".

And then there's Title X, Section 333:

TITLE 10 > Subtitle A > PART I > CHAPTER 15 > § 333

§ 333. Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

20 posted on 03/30/2007 2:05:35 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson