Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: arnoldpalmerfan
The facts contradict you. The felony language was added as an amendment to Sensenbrenner's bill.

It is interesting to note that Tancredo and Sensenbrenner, together, have 40 plus years experience in the House, yet both are sitting on the back bench, without any position of authority.

You may choose to deny reality based on the author, but most of this was presented in the Roll Call article.

Because of Tancredo, the Borderbots will not be able to even introduce legislation, much less get it passed.

But not to worry, the fools will contribute mucho dinero to Tancredo's campaign, and he will spend as little of it as possible. There is big money in campaigning for Prez, just ask Tancredo's mentors, Pat and Bay.

34 posted on 03/31/2007 3:32:06 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin

If most of the information in the article by the left-winger was presented in the Rill Call article, then why don't you simply provide a link to the Roll Call article? You chose to link to an article weritten by a left-winger containing quotes from a left-winger that works for a left-wing organization.

The facts do not contradict my assertion that an attempt was made to amend Rep. Sensenbrenner's bill so that the crime of illegal presence would be classified as a misdemeanor, rather than a felony. When that vote was taken, the Sensenbrenner bill contained language that classified illegal presence as a felony.

Please tell me what position of authority you expect Rep. Sensenbrenner to have under a Democrat-controlled House. He was chairman of the judiciary committe when the Republicans control the House. Please explain how you classify someone that was chairman of the judiciary committee as a back bencher.

Why are you afraid to say whether you supported passage of H.R.4437?

Why are you afraid to say whether you support passage of S.6211?

Why are you afraid to say what presidential candidate you are supporting?

Why are you afraid to say whether you support giving illegal aliens legal status and a path to citizenship?

You post comments concerning Rep. Tancredo's involvement in a 2005 bill related to illegal immigration, you are afraid to say whether you supported passage of that bill.

You post opinions about Rep. Tancredo's presidential campaign, but are afraid to say what candidate you support.


35 posted on 03/31/2007 6:57:02 AM PDT by arnoldpalmerfan (Tancredo for President 2008 - www.electtancredo.com and www.teamtancredo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson