Let's be honest now, you never actually bothered to read his crap did you? You just read the MSN - probably a bit of CNN with a bit of BBC chucked in and for the indepth bit you half read some ignorant IWPR bullshite - garbage for the trash handlers, that's all they're good for.
Am I right? Course I am.
We could spend forever and a day laughing over the sheer nonsense - we're talking nonsense to the n'th degree here folks - of what he said.
Let's take a very small look at his crap - here we'll see his penchant for lying. The guy was a natural , believe me.
http://www.un.org/icty/transe60/030929IT.htm
(
Question:Let me just digress here for a second. You were a captain, were you not?
Nicolic:Yes.
Question:You weren't even a first-class captain, you were just a captain. Right?
Nikolic: That's right.
Qestion: You were not a major?
Answer:What do you mean, I was not a major? What do you mean? If I'm a captain, then of course I'm not a major.
Question:But you would on various occasions represent yourself to be a major.
)
Yes folks , the wee lad went round fibbing that he was some hot shot guy , whereas in fact he was a hated , and I mean a F*&^&*$ hated , nobody.
But if it will help, here is the relevant portion of the closing statement from Mark Harmon at the Krstic trial:
Now, what are the findings of these experts who participated in these exhumations? I mentioned to Your Honours and I've shown Your
far, Mr. President and Your Honours, we know that a minimum number, and
this is a very conservative number, of 2.028 bodies have been recovered
from the sites thus far exhumed. At virtually all of these sites,
blindfolds or ligatures were found.
...
Now, there has been some suggestion by Defence witnesses that
these grave sites contain battle casualties; in other words, people who
lost their lives in active combat or were collateral damage, collateral
casualties. Now, as the experts who have testified about their findings
have made clear, it's preposterous, utterly preposterous to suggest that
the people who were blindfolded and who had their hands bound behind them
were battle casualties.
As to the defence's rebuttal of these assertions, there was none. Instead the defence chose to attempt to show that General Krstic hadn't taken over command of the Drina Corps when it was engaged in the mass execution of prisoners from Srebrenica or that the elements which were engaged in the mass executions weren't under Krstic's control.
Their lie'n'deny was dismissed as garbage, just as your and Joan's lie'n'deny is garbage.
Since Mr. Harmon's closing argument in 2001, exhumations of Srebrenica related mass graves have continued. (You will feel free to work yourself into a huff over the phrase "plastic and cloth bindings around the victim's arms", won't you?)