Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ultra Sonic 007
Ugh. Let me fix that.

“I believe the decision by United States Court of Appeals is correct. I understand the challenges that big cities face from gun violence. But banning people from having handguns in their own homes for self defense is excessive and unconstitutional. It is not a reasonable restriction. It clearly undercuts the Second Amendment, which protects the rights of law abiding individuals to keep and bear arms.”

Do my eyes deceive me? Did Rudy just flip-flop/pander?

On March 22 on the Sean Hannity radio show, he again reiterated his agreement with Parker. He stated that it “very well described” his view that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to own a gun, that “unreasonable restrictions” should be invalidated, and that gun regulations should be decided on “a state by state” basis.

Okay then.

This:

He stated that it “very well described” his view that the Second Amendment protected an individual right to own a gun, that “unreasonable restrictions” should be invalidated

Is contradicted by THIS:

and that gun regulations should be decided on “a state by state” basis.

How utterly transparent.

5 posted on 03/29/2007 12:58:11 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Vote for Duncan Hunter in 2008. Audio, Video, and Quotes in my profile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Ultra Sonic 007
Don't trust Rudy. He is a politician with actions opposite of what his current, politically motivated, survival-oriented, mouth movements sound like now. When in power, Rudy will wield power which means less freedom for you and me.
75 posted on 03/29/2007 8:45:18 PM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson