Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
I think it would be hilarious if the U.S. Supreme Court followed the principle suggested by theMiller court and ruled the AWB unconstitutional since all those weapons have a military use and cannot be prohibited.

Actually they don't. No military in the world, AFAIK, issues semiautomatic versions of those weapons. The AWB did not affect the select fire versions which militaries *do* issue and use.

Unless the new and worse AWB, HR 1022, passes and is signed by the President, the Court will never get a look at the original AWB, which expired almost 3 years ago and was not renewed.

116 posted on 04/13/2007 9:52:09 AM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
You are one piece of work, I'll give you that.

Here you are, arguing that Miller's homemade, sawed-off shotgun has military use, yet a factory-produced, semi-auto version of the M-16 doesn't.

You're credibility on this issue just went down the toilet.

120 posted on 04/13/2007 11:10:45 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson