Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time for American policy change in the Balkans
http://www.serbianna.com/columns/mb/056.shtml ^

Posted on 03/29/2007 8:36:19 AM PDT by kronos77

It is said that General Patton told his demoralized troops in WWII that to be an American it means to be a winner.

"America loves winners," Patton was attributed in saying to his troops who took his words to their patriotic hearts and won the war.

Like liberty, being a winner is the quintessential American spirit, dear and beloved, and being in company of winners, those that aspire to be victorious and free, is the predisposition of the American spirit.

In the Balkans, however, American allies are not winners but economically weak Islamic statelets, dependent on Western financial subsidies, predisposed to harboring Islamic terror and uninterested in economic growth. Their policies in the region are viewed with suspicion by their neighbors, their populace is embracing Islamic radicalism while more then half of their economy is based on criminal and otherwise questionable activity.

Bosnia and Albania, American allies in the Balkans, are all stagnant economies with an Islamic populace increasingly receptive of radical Islam.

With State Department's recent endorsement of Kosovo's independence, another future Islamic state in Europe that will depend on Western financial subsidies, America has clearly signaled to the region that progress of democracy and economic growth, particularly that of Serbia, is irrelevant and that Washington stands ready to break up democracies and demoralize the spirit of those seeking rule of law in order to pander to the Middle Eastern Islamic dictatorships who want to see another Muslim state in Europe.

In spite of Washington's tendency to acquire wrong allies in the Balkans, it is not too late for America to change its course there and to turn the possibility of a complete squander into a permanent gain.

(Excerpt) Read more at serbianna.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: balkans; islam; kosovo; serbia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: kronos77

Bump for later reading.


21 posted on 03/31/2007 9:21:33 AM PDT by F-117A (Mr. Ahtisaari, give S?pmi it's independence! Free the Sami!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LjubivojeRadosavljevic
["If you capture a Mladic and hang him right at the end of the war, fine."]... Okay, fine...Now do the same to Oric!

Oric is accused of slaughtering civilians. Mladic is accused of killing enemy prisoners of war. Technically either is a war-crime, but I can see a qualitative difference between the two. In the second case you are visiting rough-justice upon the ones who launched repeated attacks upon civilians.

Oric is a good example of someone who ought to swing from a rope. Mladic's crime makes no sense unitl you consider Oric's operations. Certainly Mladic should suffer no more punishment than Oric. If Oric's crimes merit two years in jail, then that sounds about right for Mladic.

The fact that the court was unable to effectively prosecute Oric by civilian standards of evidence tells you everything you need to know about it. Its mission is unrealistic. This is not a job for a civilian court.

You'll notice that the US refuses to submit to it, neither its own troops, nor the terrorists being held at Guantanamo. We're handling the military tribunals ourselves. When you capture someone on the battlefield, its not a pristine crime scene, and you aren't out there gathering evidence with tweezers and plastic baggies. When you hold a hearing to determine his fate, its not about his "guilt" or "innocence", its purely about whether or not he's a continuing threat. If he's a threat, you don't let him go. If he's a threat even in jail, like Saddam, then he gets the rope. If he is no longer a threat, he gets an airline ticket home. But its purely a subjective decision, based on military judgement.

In the case of US troops that commit war-crimes, again we are handling the court-martials ourselves. US military courts are probably a good deal more severe than the Hague, our guys are held to a pretty tight standard. These are actual trials with rules of evidence. But we aren't going to turn these men over to a foreign court.

In this case, the Hague has decided that Oric is no longer a threat, clearly. He's home in his bed, having got credit for time served during the trial. Based on that, I don't see how anyone could judge Mladic a threat. If Oric walks, Mladic walks. Just my opinion.

22 posted on 03/31/2007 8:09:13 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marron

Well scribed.

I would have to admit that you are a very astute individual.

You passed my exam :-)


23 posted on 03/31/2007 10:43:42 PM PDT by LjubivojeRadosavljevic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson