To: NYC Republican
OK, who do you envision as a VP on the ticket for Thompson?
My thought was, who can carry California better than Hunter?
I'm not married to any candidate yet. I lean towards Thompson or Hunter, I lean away, as far as I can get, from Gulianni or Mcain, and I don't know about Romney.
If Gulianni or Mcain get the nod, I don't know yet what I'll do.
99 posted on
03/28/2007 9:14:23 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Just another Joe
---My thought was, who can carry California better than Hunter?--
That's my thought, too. Don't be so damned negative, NYCR. Sheesh. We're focusing on the candidate for president right now anyway. We can give thought to the VP later. I'm just suggesting right now, and there's nothing wrong with doing that. Chill, bro.
100 posted on
03/28/2007 9:28:19 AM PDT by
swatbuznik
(Thompson/Hunter '08)
To: Just another Joe
Hunter will NEVER carry Ca. It's as hopeless as NY at this stage. If he could win state-wide, he should have ran for Senate. Thompson is sufficiently conservative to please the right - Hunter adds nothing, and in fact, may turn many voters if chosen.
Duncan Hunter = nice guy, great credentials, but DOA as a candidate.
102 posted on
03/28/2007 9:44:49 AM PDT by
NYC Republican
(GOPs and Conservatives' Worst Nightmare - Myopic, Single-Issue Voters)
To: Just another Joe
I would love to see Michael Steele as a VP candidate.
106 posted on
03/28/2007 9:48:33 AM PDT by
NYC Republican
(GOPs and Conservatives' Worst Nightmare - Myopic, Single-Issue Voters)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson