Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

None of this changes the fact that the Constitution grants the Federal government the power to organize and equip the armed forces, and nuclear weapons are arms of the armed forces. Under the Constitution, the government can build and maintain nukes, just as it built and maintain ships. Comparing a privateer with WMD is curious, but even if we go with it, there was also an organized Navy; the Americans did not JUST operate with letters of marque.

The argument that the government can't build and keep nukes is indefensible. So we're down to the question as to whether individuals can have personal nuclear weapons. So far, you've argued yes.


223 posted on 03/27/2007 5:09:24 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Le chien aboie; la caravane passe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13
I have argued no such thing. In fact, if you missed it, way back in another post I suggested the Constitution be "fixed" to correct these omissions.

Or, maybe you saw that and are a believer in the "living document" deal and don't think it needs "fixed".

229 posted on 03/27/2007 5:13:57 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson