Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker; ElectricStrawberry
As I wrote before - the Greek phalanx of hoplites would always lose to the Persians (until Marathon) because the Persian horse would always envelop them and the phalanx would fall apart if outflanked. The Persians were masters of combined arms tactics (using light and heavy infantry and cavalry).

At Marathon the Persians had no time to deploy their horses. At Platea where the Greeks defeated the Persian land forces after Salamis, they were able to gather a cavalry force good enough to prevent their flanks being turned. Head to head the Persians stood no chance against the heavier infantry.

After that the Macedonian Greeks developed cavalry good enough to allow the Greeks to develop combined arms tactics which allowed Alexander to take over the Persian empire.

145 posted on 03/26/2007 12:33:37 PM PDT by Longinus ("Whom did it benefit". (Cui Bono Fuerit) Longinus Cassius Roman conspirator & general (? - 42 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Longinus
Yes, of course, a phalanx is quite vulnerable on its flanks. The advantage of the position at Thermopylae is that the narrow pass gave the Greeks protection for their flanks - until the Persians got behind them.
147 posted on 03/26/2007 12:42:50 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson