There are other electable Republicans out there. IMO Newt, Thompson, even Hunter though I admit he's failing. The test is winning the primaries. If Newt or Thompson or Hunter can win the nomination, they can win the Presidency.
And you're correct in pointing out that the way to win the nomination, particularly against a candidate vulnerable on social issues, isn't painting him as too gay-friendly or an adulterer. You can be gay-friendly and oppose civil-unions, you can have one wife and act immorally, and if someone is pro-choice, they're not a murderer.
I agree. My only issue with Newt is that the media's past portayal of him (ultra-right-wing...yada yada), would be an issue, and even though he's absolutely brilliant and would be a great president, enough swing voters wouldn't be receptive because of the label. Just a thought. I don't know a lot about Hunter yet, and Thompson surely has a solid record, and would keep Christian conservatives happy. GWB was a solid candidate in both of his elections, but I was truly surprised at how many voters chose Gore/Kerry. What has become a huge issue in modern elections is the liberal press, and how their negative portrayal of ANY republican impacts voters - and loses us votes. Just as valid is how the liberal press chooses to completely ignore any negative issues about democrats. They'd have a tougher time bashing Rudy. He's never been a target of the liberal media - he's more controversial within his own party. He'd be a leader in the truest sense about the most important issue we face: the war on terror.