Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet
"Troubling incidents began several years ago, when taxi drivers at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport--about three-quarters of whom are Muslim--started refusing to transport passengers carrying alcohol. One woman, returning from France with wine, was turned away by five cabs in succession. Refusals of service now number about 100 a month, and heated altercations have erupted"

So where are the lawsuits? No mention of any legal action against those who attempt to impose their way of life on the public at large. Why is that? Are there really no lawsuits, or are they just not mentioned? I smell big money to be made here in combating the religion of filth.
3 posted on 03/25/2007 5:50:10 AM PDT by Carbonado ("Islame-ic radical" is a redundant term, just like "Leftist journalist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Carbonado
When a muzzie can't work, can't own property, can't vote and can't profit... they will have NO reason to come to America (same goes for other illegal criminal immigrants)!

They are not a religion, but they are an evil satan worshiping death cult. There are no good muzzies, except for ex-muzzies and the one's that do not believe in their cult training. Even these are suspect. Deception is a mandate from their god.

LLS
5 posted on 03/25/2007 5:58:17 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carbonado

If the American Civil Liberties Union were truly a neutral protector of the Constitution, law suits would be flying. Christians can't put a momument dedicated to the Ten Commandments up in the Alabama State House according to the ACLU, but Muslim cab drivers, based on their religion can refuse to transport non-Muslims who are carrying alcohol?

Hey ACLU, is this not an unconstitutional act? Can a person in a private job in a public place refuse the equal protection of the 14th Amendment to another because they don't practice his/her religion?

Liberals are very quiet on this.


10 posted on 03/25/2007 6:19:51 AM PDT by kjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Carbonado
So where are the lawsuits? No mention of any legal action against those who attempt to impose their way of life on the public at large. Why is that? Are there really no lawsuits, or are they just not mentioned? I smell big money to be made here in combating the religion of filth.

All the laws protecting one's religion and/or race are the problem. If you were to sue the muzzies, you would lose the suit and be labelled an intolerant bigot. And since you are not tolerant and accommodating to their religious beleifs, you would be counter sued and you would be paying big dollars for violating their rights to freely excercise their death cult religion.

15 posted on 03/25/2007 7:08:10 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson