[goldstategop]

Its funny to see liberals oppose an ultra-sound procedure. Here I was thinking they were pro-choice. Another lie. What in heaven's name are the libs afraid of? That a woman will recognize the humanity of her unborn child and decide to carry it to term? No wonder they're they're fanatically opposed to anything that might reveal what an abortion really does.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[RunningWolf]

What in heaven's name are the libs afraid of? That a woman will recognize the humanity of her unborn child and decide to carry it to term?

You got it, they have become the dealers of murder in its most violent form in the pursuit of their ideology.

[theBuckwheat]

Yes, liberals are all for "choice" and being "fully informed" when it comes to advancing causes they favor. My wife works in a Pregnancy Resource Center (PRC) and spends the bulk of her time talking to young women who have discovered they might be pregnant. Yes, the center she works at has ultrasound equipment and the proper staff to operate it.

It is important to note that when abortion advocates such as NARL, or Planned Parenthood, talk about "choice", it is a one sided choice. They do not want their customers to think of the contents of the womb as anything other than "tissue" or "products of conception".

So, when a young woman decides to examine her options and walks into a Pregnancy Resource Center and accepts an offer to see this "tissue", the vast majority are almost shocked to see a developing human being.

I think this shock almost has a double effect. The obvious effect is that the pregnancy becomes real enough to trigger the woman's natural maternalism. The second effect is a revulsion at the lies they have been told.

It is not unusual for the staff of PRCs to be accused of "denying women their choice". Or, "making women have babies they don't want". I cannot fathom how detached from reality these vitriolic insults are. I can only speculate that "telling truth to power" (a favorite liberal concept) is forbidden when that "truth" happens to shatter the alternate-reality utopia that liberals are busy constructing.

Nobody in the NARL/PP camp protested when Bill Clinton famously said he wanted abortion "safe, but rare" simply because they knew it was a meaningless statement when abortion on demand up until the moment of natural childbirth is still legal, as it is at this very moment. Apart from their ideology, NRAL/PP has a gross conflict of interest, for PP makes millions in profits every year from providing abortion services. They view ultrasound-equipped PRCs as being dangerous to their profits.

[ops33]

I remember once getting into an argument with a woman who supported abortion without any restrictions. The basis of her argument was that a fetus wasn't a human being therefore killing it was not morally wrong. I asked her only one question. I asked her "What if you are wrong?" She stammered and stuttered but could not answer my question.