To: xzins
This would be an excellent time to take out the Iranian Navy.
120 posted on
03/23/2007 6:25:14 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
I turned to CNN to hear about coverage on this topic (since FOX is fluff this morning) and I'm sick to my stomach by the "unbiased" interview I just saw. What's worse, Anna coverage or the crap CNN spouts?
Where's the real news coverage in this country? (Besides here of course.) I can't stomach CNN, and FOX plain sucks nowadays.
130 posted on
03/23/2007 6:29:03 AM PDT by
Miztiki
(The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. Eccles. 10:4)
To: P-Marlowe
This would be an excellent time to take out the Iranian Navy. That's a good point. If Iran didn't have any boats, we wouldn't have naval incidents like this anymore.
133 posted on
03/23/2007 6:30:02 AM PDT by
Steel Wolf
(If every Republican is a RINO, then no Republican is a RINO.)
To: P-Marlowe
Long-standing treaties and relationships with Britain make just about any response possible.
Taking out the IRanian navy and any missile sites near the Strait of Hormuz would be an excellent preparation for an assault on nuke sites.
140 posted on
03/23/2007 6:32:13 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: P-Marlowe; xzins
Yep. Once the Navy's gone, the rest is pretty superfluous. As the Russians about the Kursk.
275 posted on
03/23/2007 12:54:36 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson