Creationists are not anti-science unless science demands that they accept that the scientific method is the only way we can know anything. As for the peculiar term "scientific community." is that politically-speaking simply another lobby, little different in its acivities from the gay-rights lobby in trying to get the law to silence its opponents?
Is it all right if they demand that the scientific disciplines be based on the scientific method, or do you demand that theologians reserve the right to overrule their conclusions if they conflict with religious dogma?
As for the peculiar term "scientific community." is that politically-speaking simply another lobby, little different in its acivities from the gay-rights lobby in trying to get the law to silence its opponents?
The Founders specifically made reference to the legitimate role of government in advancing and supporting science and scientific inquiry. You tell me if it's "just another lobby".