[Sunsong]

Explain to me, if you will, why you don't consider the ceaseless posting of pro-Rudy articles spam, but everything that's posted by our side is called spam?

Wow - what a spin. You could try out for a liberal(s). Spam has a definition - it is posting the exact same thing over and over. Posting new articles on the same subject is not spam.

And - you are free to not click on Rudy threads. Imagine that(s).

[bluecollarman]

"Spam has a definition - it is posting the exact same thing over and over."

I really don't think that is the definition of spam is it?

I would think it was something like an unwanted or unsolicited posts would be closer. Just because something is repeated does not make it spam unless it is unwanted or breaks some kind of rule that Jim has. Right?

[TommyDale]

"Posting new articles on the same subject is not spam."

This comment reminds me of the old Monty Python skit on Spam.

"Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam;"

Any way you want to dress the Rudy postings up, it's still Spam.