[dmw]

"Apparently dmw can't tell the difference between posting different new articles, about someone who IS news, vs. others posting the identical 30 year old spam on every thread."

There were several MSM articles posted today that were unfavorable about your candidate. They were either called old and outdated, or they were called spam. Yeah, it works both ways.

BTW, aren't you the same poster who lied about Rick Satorum supporting Rudy? Yeah, I thought so. You have no credibility here. No conservatives here believe much of what you say. You never did back your statement up even though several of us called you on it.

[FairOpinion]

Santorum's own words that I posted were CLEARLY supportive of Rudy.

You are being worse than childish, when you are trying to insist, that unless someone actually utters some specific phrase DEFINED BY YOU, it doesn't count as "support".

You are the one who is LYING about me.

[onyx]

In the interest of saving bandwidth, let me explain SPAM to you.

narses posts SPAM. Have a look and see if you can identify SPAM. Just scroll down a little.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/user-posts?id=84362

The posting of articles is not SPAM. The posting of the same article is called a duplicate posting and they're usually pulled, unless the first posting was 24 hours earlier.

The postings of several, but different articles on the same subject is not SPAM.

I will agree with you that Rudy articles appear most often, but that's not SPAM.