Your mysticism causes you to create a mind- spun fabrication that a business owner's property rights are different than the homeowner's property rights.
The article outlines the constitutional position, not "mysticism" :
"-- Businesses are prohibited from discriminating because of race, age, sex, religion, nationality, etc. And clearly they are also prohibited from discriminating against those who exercise their right to keep and bear arms for personal protection and other lawful purposes like hunting and target shooting.
Individual constitutional and legal rights do not end when we drive onto a business parking lot. Simply put, business property rights do not trump the Constitution or the law.
State legislatures have a duty to protect the constitutional rights of individuals from abuses. They must act as a shield to protect constitutional rights of the people; they also must act as the point of a sword to punish those who violate our inalienable rights.
That is at the heart of this debate. --"
That's where the second-class citizen, less than equal citizen phrase got it's meaning. Who forced you against your will to work for the employer whose rules/policy you disagree with? Nobody.
Who forced the employer to make a 'rule' that contravenes our right to carry arms in our vehicles? -- That's what I thought, -- Nobody.
That's what I thought. Nobody is forcing you to drive to and from work without a gun. If you drive to and from work without a gun that is your choice. You made the choice to work for the employer according to the rules of the agreement that both of you agreed to. No second class citizen there. Both of you are equally free to say no and not enter into agreement.
Our basic agreement was made over 200 years ago. We the people have a right to carry arms.
You are free to say no and not enter into that agreement.
tpaine: "You know full well what people are 'abusing abuse' to get me suspended - and why they do it..."110
Zon: How would I know that? Because you say so? LMAO!! 113
Well, before I even consider responding further I need you to apologize for falsely accusing me of, in your own words, "You know full well what people are 'abusing abuse' to get me suspended - and why they do it. -- Now, incredibly enough, you want to play that same game, -- because we disagree about our right to carry arms, you want me silenced."