Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
Thus we see:

--- 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that employees be disarmed while going to or from work] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

"-- They cannot delegate a power they themselves do not have. --"

Thus we see:

--- 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that land owners allow armed people on their property] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

OR --- 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that employers hire someone who will not comply with their rules at their business] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

"-- They cannot delegate a power they themselves do not have. --"

Fairly simple constitutional principle, but a lot of FReepers seem to have a very tough time understanding it...

And some have a hard time realizing it applies to ALL constitutional freedoms, not just RKBA.

103 posted on 03/15/2007 5:28:15 PM PDT by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird
Thus we see:
--- 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that employees be disarmed while going to or from work] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

"-- They cannot delegate a power they themselves do not have. --"

--- 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that land owners allow armed people on their property] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

No one in our constitutional community wants to force land owners to allow 'armed people' on their property.
-- We want our right to carry arms in our vehicles to be respected by landowning employers/shopkeepers who we do business & work with.


And a court decision upholding that right is not a "decree".

107 posted on 03/15/2007 6:11:57 PM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: LexBaird

 'Even if everyone in the community desires -- [that employers hire someone who will not comply with their rules at their business] -- they have no right individually or collectively to force them to do it. --'

If they had the right individually or collectively that would make a business owner a second class citizen that's not as equal as the home owner that can refuse armed persons entry to their property. Give them an inch and they'll take a mile. Next thing you know they won't allow the second class business owners to permit smoking on their property while the more equal homeowner can do that. Opps, they're already doing that. And now they're moving on to banning transfats in restaurants. To politicians, bureaucrats and some people on this forum, business owners are second class, or less equal citizens.

109 posted on 03/15/2007 6:38:00 PM PDT by Zon (Honesty outlives the lie, spin and deception -- It always has -- It always will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson