Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney Runs. Romney Stumbles.
New West ^ | 3-13-07 | Jill Kuraitis

Posted on 03/13/2007 9:03:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance

When a candidate for president blows into town, most reporters show up. There’s always a chance he or she will say something surprising or stupid, and there could even be a chance to ask a substantial question and get an answer with some teeth to it, but it’s not likely.

That’s just the way these things go.

But when the Idaho press showed up today for Republican candidate Mitt Romney, his people were still rehearsing – badly - the drill of the classic obligatory campaign fly-through. They issued conflicting information about the place and time of the press conference, with most reporters never notified at all and nobody in charge who could straighten it all out. Attempts to reach the campaign by phone with follow-up questions went unanswered. Multiple cell phone and landline numbers were available, but nobody responded except to refer us to someone else – who wasn’t there. It was a disgraceful runaround. It’s early, but when a field organization is THIS bad, it’s not encouraging.

Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, a nice man with good hair who was considered a superior governor by opinion leaders on both sides of the aisle, provided a possible reason for all that uncertainty: he’s remarkably uninspiring. Anybody who has ever called Al Gore “wooden” has never seen Mitt Romney.

It’s nothing to do with politics or party; it has everything to do with electability. Everyone wants their horse in the race to have what it takes to cross the finish line first, and today, Romney didn’t have it.

I was eerily reminded of the novel and film of “The Manchurian Candidate,” a thriller in which a handsome war hero is controlled via a brain microchip and turned into the perfect presidential candidate, who is later directed by evil forces via the chip. His speeches are repetitive platitudes which seem to arrive in his mouth by computer. Romney is good-looking, fit, beautifully turned out with perfect white teeth, and unfortunately, he speaks that way, too.

He’s certainly not the first presidential candidate to employ banality in an attempt to say nothing which would commit him to any firm policy, but it’s still disappointing. The weariest old adages flowed from Romney like so much water. “Look at my wife and me and our family if you want to know our values,” he said.

“Look at my heart, character and experience.”

“I see the internet age and the YouTube era as a great opportunity to take my message directly to the people.” And that message would be…..?

Romney did name universal health insurance, on which he has an impressive record, as a top priority of his, but was equivocal about exactly how he’d handle it as President. He said the “Muslim jihad” needed a solution, but offered none. He worked up a little enthusiasm about global competition – “especially with the Chinese” – but really only came alive when talking about his experience as President and CEO of the Salt Lake Organizing Committee for the 2002 winter Olympics. “We took something in trouble and made it a success.”

Which he did. An excellent Olympics, indeed.

Outstanding comic relief was provided by a protestor who, complete with rolled R’s and dramatic Shakespearean tones, boomed out, “MISTAH RRROMNEY! WHY DO THE MORMONS SAY JESUS IS THE DEVIL’S BROTHAH?”

Nobody answered that, or was much interested in Romney’s Mormonism. That was good.

Asked about the Rocky Mountain West, Romney said he saw “the spirit of innovation. The opportunity-seeking of the American West has long been the character of the American people.” (I can’t interpret that one.) He spoke of technology innovations which came from the West, but again, nothing about what that had to do with….anything.

“Coal has a major role to play in our future energy policy, along with wind and solar power.” No specifics.

Of the evangelical Christian groups which seem to dog Romney wherever he goes, he had this to say, “I will do my best to establish my bona fides with that group.”

“On the internet, people can see me in speeches, get to know a candidate on a personal basis, in unguarded moments, and see the true character of a candidate.”

Despite many years working in, and watching campaigns - enough to know the hard realities - I still say enough, enough, enough with the Family Values and the Spirit of America and the Heart and Character and Hope for the Future and…..holy MOTHER of mercy….STOP! For once, can’t we please have a candidate who says, “I believe this. I will do this. I will not do that. I don’t care who gets mad; it’s the right thing to do. I don’t care who gave me money, it’s the right thing to do.”

I know. Incredibly naïve. Hopelessly idealistic. Never going to happen, and all that.

But isn’t it, in our unguarded, raw heart of hearts, what all of us truly want from candidates? If you could wave a wand and turn them all into decisive, plain-speaking, committed people who said what they mean and mean what they say, wouldn’t you?

Of course you would. But in the words of Governor Romney, “If this is a place where I can come and raise money as well as strengthen my political base, I’m going to do it.” And at $1,000 a plate, 100 people showed up to have lunch with him.

MISTAH ROMNEY! YOU’LL BE BACK!


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: bigots; electableconserv; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-326 next last
To: EternalVigilance
For once, can’t we please have a candidate who says, “I believe this. I will do this. I will not do that.

You've got him.


241 posted on 03/14/2007 4:48:05 AM PDT by Jim Noble (But that's why they play the games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
My take on MItt:

Phony enough to get nominated. Not phony enough to get elected.

242 posted on 03/14/2007 4:49:04 AM PDT by Jim Noble (But that's why they play the games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

I'm not writing him off yet. But bragging on your NRA lifetime membership (obtained just weeks ago) after being a gun grabber for most of his adult life does not sit well with this lifetime member.


243 posted on 03/14/2007 4:55:45 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
And that horrible, horrible healthcare bill he signed.

He worked with Hoover thinktank on it. He avoided the employer mandates, the key flaw in Arnold's implementation in CA.

Whether you like it or not, many Blue states are going to mandate healthcare or at least health insurance, the same way we already mandate car insurance.

When we talk about sending issues back to the states like overturning Roe, we should understand in advance that it means there will be outcomes like this in the Blue states. I think there are signs that the courts (and the Court) are moving and have moved in this direction, the most recent being that overturning of the D.C. laws on possessing handguns.
244 posted on 03/14/2007 5:13:56 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It's already crumbling.

Actually, there was a report of that a month or so back. There's more recent news that it won't cost as much after all. Time will tell.

As for you posting this article, I don't think it matters that it was a liberal writer. I don't see how it bashed Romney's Mormonism. It did contain a lot of trite journalism insider backbiting but that's not unusual. And I do think that every quickie fundraising dinner like this one is a bit disorganized. It's fly-in-eat-rubber-chicken-fly-away-with-money primary politics. I'm not sure why it's considered so unusual because every major candidate in both parties has done it for decades.

I am curious though. Have you picked a candidate for the primary yet? I'm not saying you have to in order to oppose Romney. I oppose Giuliani and have a mixed reaction to Romney and other candidates. I do think we should kick the tires and slam the doors on every one of these used cars before we fall for a slick sales pitch and take a lemon off the lot. I do find it interesting that you seem to focus more attention on Romney than on Giuliani who seems far more liberal to me and who is campaigning against our own platform on abortion, gun rights, etc. Why do you think that Romney is a greater liberal threat and Trojan horse than Giuliani?

At any rate, I've noticed your postings about Romney's record have reached spammish proportions. I would suggest that you would be more effective if you rotate your materials and confine yourself to shorter pieces. Lots of us, maybe most of us, just scroll past any post that looks spammish if it is more than half of a printed page in length. It's just a suggestion, ask around and see what others think.

Keep kickin' those tires. Nothing wrong with finding out all the pluses and the minuses on every single candidate that can break 10% in the polls.
245 posted on 03/14/2007 5:26:53 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

You speak with selective fort tongue, because that is not what Romney said, Verginius Rufus!

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1799287/posts?page=505#505


246 posted on 03/14/2007 5:31:06 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
And he's going to need traincar loads of their money to keep the hacks he's hired across the country going.

The man is a billionaire, EV. Now that's paper value. But he could probably raise $250 million in cash on short order and could, just with Mormon money, raise another $100 million and run an entire national campaign with just that money.

For Romney, these are opportunities to make connections and build up political organization in all these states. Any politician, however well-funded, still has to rub palms with key support groups. Even if it means munching rubberized chicken with them.
247 posted on 03/14/2007 5:31:51 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #248 Removed by Moderator

To: onyx; EternalVigilance
Don't be astonished. EV is a vicious and vile bigot and hater.

You can say that again she used politics as a front to legitimized her position!

It never works EternalVigilance people always see right throuh it!

249 posted on 03/14/2007 5:38:04 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: restornu
I always knew you were a closet anti Mormon!

Hey, I'm not a closet anti-Mormon. I'm a blatant anti-Mormon as you must recall pretty clearly from theology threads here at FR.

But I could vote for Romney easily. If I think he is the best conservative pick and will uphold the party platform.

I won't vote for Giuliani. He's just too leftwing and proud of it to boot. And it's not because I'm anti-Catholic. Because I am, in fact, theologically anti-Catholic as much as I am anti-Mormon. And I certainly supported vocally and early the dumping of evangelical Harriet for Catholic Alito on the Court and took plenty of hits from the Bushbot faction for it here at FR. So I am just fine with the five Catholics we Republicans have put on the Court. In fact, I'm hoping the phony Catholic (Kennedy) will start behaving like a real Catholic.

Try not to play the Mormon/anti-Mormon card so much. I think it's a distraction to even debate it at any great length. I don't believe (and I don't think Romney believes) that it will be the significant factor in whether he gets the nomination. Focus on the positives and knock down the false assertions and half-truths of the MassResistance bunch. Not that everything they say is wrong but too much of it is just half-truths and needs to be exposed so we get a clear idea of Romney's record in governing a terminally Blue state.
250 posted on 03/14/2007 5:53:51 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; All
How dare we trot out family values, is the underlying implication.

I'm sorry, but the "family values" of a politician who supported abortion, full-blown, for over 35 years, who supported the gay agenda, full-blown, throughout his term as Governor, are irrelevent. How about the families of the 4000 dead babies who were killed today by the NARAL ghouls and their political enablers?

Yada yada yada!

EV selective fort tongue disimformation machine!

Romney had a platform it was not on abortion or any other liberal agenda Romney was in "Chappaquiddick land," get real folks and stop listening to EternalVigilance!

Romney had a platform on cutting taxes and lowing crime etc. it had nothing to do with Chappaquiddick land sacred COW abortion etc!

It was the media pressing about issues Romney had NO control over Federal Laws!

251 posted on 03/14/2007 5:56:33 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Oh, no need to sell me on Rudy's shortcomings. Flip flopping is the LEAST of his problems. Romney may prove himself. We shall have to wait and see.

As long as you don't flipflop and turn liberal, I'm still supporting you in the primaries.

Pissant '08
When you're tired of being
p___ed on by amateurs

252 posted on 03/14/2007 5:58:16 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

LOL. I can never win. The number of immediately unemployed government employees and bureaucrats would overwhelm the unemployment system.


253 posted on 03/14/2007 6:03:54 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
“On the internet, people can see me in speeches, get to know a candidate on a personal basis, in unguarded moments, and see the true character of a candidate.” Despite many years working in, and watching campaigns - enough to know the hard realities - I still say enough, enough, enough with the Family Values and the Spirit of America and the Heart and Character and Hope for the Future and…..holy MOTHER of mercy….STOP!

For once, can’t we please have a candidate who says, “I believe this. I will do this. I will not do that. I don’t care who gets mad; it’s the right thing to do. I don’t care who gave me money, it’s the right thing to do.”

GOOD FOR ROMNEY!

This was nothing but a bunch of hecklers and hypocrites looking for something they thought they could spin, like you EternalVigilance

BTW Lucifer is also your brother EV!:)

254 posted on 03/14/2007 6:07:13 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
George W. Bush I know your views on the LDS, but ET tries to deny her position as she goes after Romney when many LDS knows also her true feelings about them!

I am not for Romney because he LDS, I am for him because I know he will do the right thing!

Harry Reid is LDS I would throw him to the wolves!

255 posted on 03/14/2007 6:12:43 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Try not to play the Mormon/anti-Mormon card so much. I think it's a distraction to even debate it at any great length.

Thank you George, I appreciate your advice!

The Bottom line is to do what is right for this country!

256 posted on 03/14/2007 6:21:12 AM PDT by restornu ("Try to Lead by Example, Not by Trampling on Another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Hey EV. You know you've done good when you strike the moonbats nerve. They're coming out of the woodwork. Blackbird.


257 posted on 03/14/2007 6:28:54 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (A vote for rudyputin IS a vote for the hildabeast!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Harry Reid is LDS I would throw him to the wolves!

Me too. But he's so ineffective, you have to worry that someone more competent like Schumer would take his place!

We'd better be careful what we wish for. ; )
258 posted on 03/14/2007 6:31:53 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

"Still waiting for some proof of your claim, btw."


Stil waiting for you to tell us all who YOU support, btw.


259 posted on 03/14/2007 6:33:38 AM PDT by sevenbak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Don't give up just yet.


260 posted on 03/14/2007 6:33:45 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 321-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson