[free_for_now]

To everyone who voted no:

Since a Guiliani/Thompson ticket would mean that the only alternatives would be either to vote Democrat, not vote or to cast a protest vote, I pose this additional question...

Would you actually prefer a Clinton/Edwards presidency to a Guiliani/Thompson one?

[dforest]

Gee whiz, what thick heads. How about a ticket with Thompson on the top?

What part of that do you not get?

[Leatherneck_MT]

"Would you actually prefer a Clinton/Edwards presidency to a Guiliani/Thompson one?"

Better question to ask is, will I personally withhold my support of a political party that has consistantly over the last 32 years bent me over a barrel and refused to even give me a kiss when they were finished?

Yep I would

[dforest]

I will answer you here. If you read down through the posts. It is obvious. If Thompson is in the lead role you might have, and I say might have, something people could deal with.

Look at all the no's. People can sometimes give a little, but Rudy is not going to go at the top of the ticket.

I know I won't go for it.

[mad_as_he$$]

Man I am so tired of the that line. Just give me my cigarette and blindfold - shoot me or hang me or lethal inject me. It's all the same if you put it that way. No wonder Conservatives have a vacuum of leadership if that is the best reasoning you can come up with. I for one am tired of two crappy choices for national office.