[jdsteel]

I'm just sayin'......

[twigs]

No, it wouldn't ease my fears. I'd be much happier with a Thompson/Giuliani ticket! And give Giuliani the level of responsibility that Pres. Bush has given VP Cheney.

[wku man]

Tancredo/Thompson or Thompson/Tancredo: yes
Thompson/Paul or Paul/Thompson: yes
Thompson/Hunter: yes
Thompson/Gingrich: yes
Other combinations of the above named individuals/other good, real conservatives: very interesting, and I'd likely give them some thought
Rudy McRomney/anyone else or anyone else/Rudy McRomney: not if you held a gun to my head.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

[Sprite518]

No,

I like Fred, but I do not vote for the VP. Giuliani is a pro baby killer, gun grabber and pro rump wrangler and very soft on taxes, the global warming scam and on and on.

[buck61]

Yes, but only the other way round!!!!!!!

[USArmySpouse]

Thompson/Giuliani most definitely.

[lucky american]

A big No, here!!

[clilly54]

Nope.

I'll vote Thomson/(insert name hear) if he can be convinced to run.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed. He can get people excited about the race, and bet anything the demorats can come up with!

[sgtbono2002]

No.

[TitansAFC]

Nope. No Rudy, under any circumstance. Not even if I were the deciding vote in the General election.

[Recovering_Democrat]

Look, I'm voting R regardless. I won't countenance keeping Democrats in power any more than I have to. That being said, Rudy has not convinced me he's the conservative we need in the White House.

Mitt has done a decent job selling himself (and please, that is WHAT all of them have to do)...and Fred Thompson does have a chance at my support.

I love Newt, but I don't think he's electable...just doesn't have it in the image department. Of course if he's the nominee, I'll vote for him.

Reagan was an awesome candidate for conservatives because he looked happy most of the time, he believed in America, and he exuded a positive point of view. Thank God he was also conservative...because I remember a smiling, happy, cheerful lookin' candidate who didn't have a conservative bone in him: Jimmy Carter. He got elected and it was a national nightmare.

Same with Clinton--he was pragmatic enough to support free trade and he was right about Iraq, even though now he pretends like he never said anything about it...but he, too, had a smiling image and was elected twice (by pluralities of the electorate and not majorities, though).

I'm certain Thompson, despite his rough exterior, could promote a positive image. Rudy is doing that too--but he isn't as conservative as I'd like. Mitt is also winning in the image department, and I do believe him when he says he's become more socially conservative over the past few years.

Just my opinion, probably more than you wanted, and I am flexible: heck, the primaries are MONTHS away still. :)

RD

[RaceBannon]

Hunter/Thompson

or

Thompson/Hunter

[TigersEye]

No.

[Repeal The 17th]

There's an awful lot of folks around these parts,
that if they found themselves dying of starvation,
would apparently turn down a perfectly good meal,
because it was not their favorite food.

[Collier]

I'm voting Republican, no matter who it is.

The Dummies are just nuts.

[CzarNicky]

yes

[libsrscum]

Yes. It is a million times better than anything else the dark side will offer.

dems win. America loses.

[southland]

Thompson yes Gulianni no

[onyx]

I will be voting for the GOP ticket regardless!

[afnamvet]

No to Giuliani/Thompson.

Yes to Hunter/Thompson.

[Politicalmom]

Nope.