"Because he was there on 9/11 and has a STRONG stand against terrorism. "
What ECACTLY is his "stand" on terrorism and how is it different or better than other candidates?
Rudy's stand on terrorism is "different" and "better" because he has some actual experience dealing with it, and I don't refer only to 9/11.
Name one other candidate who has had to actually deal with the bastards in an up-close, personal way, or who has had any significant executive-level leadership crises to deal with.