1 posted on
03/12/2007 3:16:29 PM PDT by
KDD
To: KDD
2 posted on
03/12/2007 3:27:02 PM PDT by
Enterprise
(I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
To: KDD
You ever been to DC? You better have a gun with you.
4 posted on
03/12/2007 3:53:05 PM PDT by
RC2
To: KDD
Only Ron Paul would take a clear and undeniable victory like this and whine about it.
"It appears the Court rejected the District of Columbia 's nonsensical argument that the 2nd Amendment confers only a "collective right,"..."
There's no "appears to" about - the Appeals Court was explicit in their rejection of both the "collective right" and "sophisticated collective right" theories; they also slammed the 9th Circus for its contorted logic in Silveira v Lockyer.
5 posted on
03/12/2007 4:26:25 PM PDT by
Redbob
To: KDD
Nice to see some constitutional application of the law, especially in this town.
To: KDD
Lock and Load Freedom bump to all! I love the smell of victory.
To: KDD
Now we need McCain, Guiliani, and Romney's thoughts on the decision... ; )
To: KDD; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; KoRn; traviskicks; ..
11 posted on
03/12/2007 5:35:03 PM PDT by
OrthodoxPresbyterian
(We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
To: KDD
RP picked a great topic this week and gave a good summary of the issue and his own stance.
Unarmed liberty will be short-lived, as RP points out. It is the classic American position.
To: KDD
Ron Paul is spot on once again. If this guy hits any more home runs, they're going to have to move the fence back.
15 posted on
03/12/2007 6:21:16 PM PDT by
mysterio
To: KDD
From the article:
"This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government."
This needs to be repeated; Too many pro-gunners exclusively refer to the crime prevention aspect of the 2nd ammendment when a quick study of the founding fathers indicate that the primary purpose of the RKBA was to allow a resistance to corrupt governments.
To: KDD
Only armed citizens can resist tyrannical government.Only citizens, in fact, are armed. Anybody who is disarmed involuntarily, isn't a citizen, but a subject, by definition (no matter what they call themselves...)
the infowarrior
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson