Skip to comments.
'300' Movie Slammed by Liberal Reviewer (Bush Reference)
Box Office Mojo ^
 | March 9, 2007
 |  Scott Holleran
Posted on 03/12/2007 11:12:42 AM PDT by Dr._Joseph_Warren
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next  last
    Talk about someone who just doesn't get it!!! 
 Only a liberal could say that words like tyranny, freedom, reason need to be supported or they have no meaning. 
 Only a liberal could misconstrue what is meant by the word 'sacrifice'. 
"Why bother to fight?" Indeed!!!
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    The Iranians hate 300. 
 
The Greeks hate 300. 
 
The liberals hate 300. 
 
That makes it a must see.
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    If sacrifice is 
not noble, why bother to fight either?
 The liberal default position is not fighting in any case, so what's this bozo's point?
 
3
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:17:50 AM PDT
by 
Argus
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    Drama fags hate George Bush. Just ask Frank Rich.
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    I saw it and liked it. Apparently so did a lot of people 'cause they grossed 70 Mil this week end. This guy knows nothing.
 
5
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:18:46 AM PDT
by 
70th Division
(If we loose the Republic we have lost it all.)
 
To: Tijeras_Slim
    The Greeks hate it? Where'd you hear this?
 
6
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:19:23 AM PDT
by 
wastedyears
("These colours don't run, from cold bloody war." - Steve Harris, Bruce Dickinson)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    Box office mojo? More like box office mumbo jumbo.
 
7
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:19:53 AM PDT
by 
6SJ7
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    "Slammed" alert. Apparently there is no other word other than "slam" that can be substituted for "criticizes". What's next, "Yo, yo, dem lib haters done slammed on that 300 movie, yo!" as a headline?
 
8
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:20:21 AM PDT
by 
L98Fiero
(A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    This reporter suffers from what is called "Liberal Hate Fixation"... 
 
...everything is seen through and clouded by this emotional disorder. 
 
From the movies you watch, to the salad you eat, down to the color of socks you wear and how you put'em on. 
 
All of life becomes subordinate to this hyper-hatred. 
 
9
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:22:07 AM PDT
by 
VaBthang4
("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    Hmmm...thanks Scott. Your review just inspired me to go see it again this weekend. I suggest everyone on FR see it who can stomach some violence (okay, a LOT of violence). The more these lefties open their mouths about the movie, the more they appear like the cowardly, perverted and corrupt priests and senators depicted in the movie.
10
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:22:36 AM PDT
by 
The Blitherer
(What the devil is keeping the Yanks?  Duncan Hunter for President '08!)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    Most of my liberal friends hated the Lord of the Ring trilogy. I'd expect them to hate this movie too.
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
12
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:24:45 AM PDT
by 
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
 
To: All
    Like watching a blood-drunk barbarian on a rampage o/` I'm-a get get get get you drunk, get you blood-drunk off my stump o/`
 
13
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:25:51 AM PDT
by 
Sloth
(The GOP is to DemonRats in politics as Michael Jackson is to Jeffrey Dahmer in babysitting.)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    The army that the 300 stood up against, was that of Xerxes, King of Persia (which is present-day Iran). The size of that Persian Army was variously guessed as being between 50,000 and a million. While I doubt the latter figure, the biggest problem would be logistics for that army, simply keeping them fed. How does even one of the mightiest powers of 480 BC, manage to move that many soldiers and all their supply lines, over a distance of well over a thousand miles, from Persia to the Greek archipeligo? Now if Xerxes was staging from Asia Minor, a much larger army could be moved in a relatively short time, but still well short of the million or so that was being referred to. 
 
The 300 Spartans under Leonidias that kept the entire Persian army bottled up has to stand as one of the most effective delaying tactics of all time.
 
14
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:26:35 AM PDT
by 
alloysteel
(If you cannot bring yourself to condemn someone, at least make the praise as faint as possible.)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    History????
 
 It is a legend. No one knows what happened anyway.
 
 Sounds like this idiot was just looking for a reason to make a political statement.
15
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:27:00 AM PDT
by 
grapeape
(Hope is not a method - Gen Hugh Shelton)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    I think someone sent out a memo to all the liberal movie reviewers in the US, because they ALL have the same talking points. Or maybe they just all read the NY Times review and are falling over themselves to copycat it. Though the NY Times piece didn't mention President Bush, it was very condescending about the attitude among the Spartans that "freedom isn't free".
 
16
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:28:28 AM PDT
by 
SuziQ
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    Here are some excerpts from Scott Holleran's review of Robert DeNiro's ridiculous "The Good Shepherd," a movie about the CIA and the Cold War:
  
 "With a murky script by Eric Roth, who wrote the intolerable Munich (with Tony Kushner), the origins of the CIA are depicted in the person of Edward Wilson (implacable Matt Damon), a Skull and Bones college kid who is tapped for spy games during World War 2.
  
 "But, first, Damon's inscrutable character is introduced in a Bay of Pigs Cuba invasion plotthat was one of President Kennedy's foreign policy debaclesthat ties into a scheme implicating someone close to Edward Wilson. This monotonous movie moves like molasses, . . ."
  
 "In the end, The Good Shepherd does pull off an accomplishment of sorts: in conveying the idea that defending America during the Cold War means losing one's soul, Mr. DeNiro has created what may be the first pro-Soviet U.S. movie since the Soviet Union ceased to exist."
17
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:29:18 AM PDT
by 
Brad from Tennessee
(Anything a politician gives you he has first stolen from you)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    I think Hollaran is a Libertarian, since I have seen him rip socialism in movies before.
 
18
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:29:19 AM PDT
by 
Paradox
(Secular Conservative, thank God!)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    In the movie, the King says this is the birth of democracy and that democracy is not free, that it requires sacrifice. I completely understand the liberals concern with the concept of sacrifice for freedom. 
I saw the movie this weekend, it is excellent.
 
19
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:30:52 AM PDT
by 
Ben Mugged
(Always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.)
 
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
    300 is submerged in style over substance.
 
This could go for lots of movies...
 
 Kill Bill 1&2 - Pulp Fiction - From Dusk til Dawn - An Inconvenient Tru....uh etc.etc.
20
posted on 
03/12/2007 11:31:07 AM PDT
by 
Liberty Valance
(theconservativecandidate@still2early.com)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-135 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson