[OrthodoxPresbyterian]

I don't care how great a champion of conservatism he supposedly is; if a person allies themselves with the Cindy Sheehan left they have no more business being president than Kim Jong Il does. Ron Paul is the Benedict Arnold of conservatism: A great American except for that little treason thing.

Ron Paul has committed no Treason.

The ruling government of Iraq is dominated by the psychopathic gang of murderers known as the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) and the Islamic Al Dawa Party, who are the very same Islamic Terrorist Parties which bombed the US & French Embassies in Kuwait, and murdered 241 United States Marines in Beirut in 1983. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, of the Al Dawa Party, was the Bureau Chief of the Al Dawa Party's terrorist "Jihad Office" in Damascus in the 1980s and was thus heavily responsible for Al Dawa operations in Beirut, while parliament member Jamal Jafaar Mohammed of his ruling coalition is one of the "Kuwait 17", still under a Kuwaiti death sentence (in absentia) for his direct involvement in the vicious attack on the US Embassy in Kuwait! Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate calling for an immediate END to all Military and Financial support for the criminal Islamic Terrorist thug-regime of Iraq.

Under the 2002 State of the Union Address, the United States MUST NOT provide material support to Nations which "harbor terrorists". The Theocratic Islamic thug-regime of Iraq does knowingly, and willfully, harbor self-confessed and even convicted Anti-American Terrorists -- in their Ruling Coalition!

Therefore, RON PAUL is the ONLY 100% Anti-Terrorist candidate.

[Mr. Silverback]

Yes, he wants to hand Al-Qaeda another country to run...that worked out really well for us last time.

Note that in your quote (is that from Paul?) there's a link back to Wikipedia's entry on the Al Dawa party. The text of the link says Al Dawa carried out the beirut bombing, but the wikipedia article it offers as "proof" says nothing of the sort. I find it very strange that Mr. Paul has to play fast and loose with the facts or outrright lie so often when he discusses the war. It seems that if the Iraq War was such a bad idea and directly contravened by the Constitution, he should be able to tell the truth and make his case quite ably.

Even if every word in your quote were true, Paul has lied about the war, colluded with America's enemies and wants use to LOSE (not change course, but LOSE) in Iraq. That makes him a traitor, and his justifiable animosity toward the Maliki government is just a tool in his effort to bring our country to a major defeat.

Back a traitor if you want, it's a free country. But don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining.