Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge warns of child-abusing homeschoolers
World Net Daily ^ | March 10, 2007 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 03/11/2007 11:50:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: jude24
The simple fact of the matter is that the government - especially in this more technical age - has a compelling interest in ensuring that children are adequately educated so that they have options other than welfare or slinging burgers at McDonalds.

Compulsory schooling isn't about learning. It never has been.

141 posted on 03/13/2007 5:32:00 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Michael Farris, cofounder of the HSLDA, has called for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to protect the right of parents to educate their children at home, in light of such developments in Europe.

I support homeschooling. Bigetime. But does anyone other than me, think this is a little over the top?

Educational law reduces to one question: Who has the primary responsibility for educating children, parents or the government?

The entire debate hinges on the answer.

142 posted on 03/13/2007 5:35:21 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
You could point your friend to these testimonies of post-abortive women.

He wouldn't read them. I sent him a technical article on computer modeling which explained how designing accurate climate models is essentially not possible. Got a nasty one liner back in all caps. Which is a reliable indicator that I have struck a nerve. The "truth" nerve, the one that really hurts.

143 posted on 03/13/2007 5:39:22 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: metmom
How is it any different than allowing them to send their kids to public schools?

Great point. The only place where I was in danger as a child was in school. I got in one fight in my neighborhood (which I could have chosen to avoid), as opposed to several in school (which I couldn't). I was also mugged in the jr. high bathroom. The threat of violence always loomed. And I was a pretty "mainstream" kid. Lot's of kids had it far worse.

144 posted on 03/13/2007 5:39:34 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The government school bureaucrats will **never** demand testing of homeschoolers. In fact, they will lobby against it. Why? Because the government school educrats do NOT want to be embarrassed by the flamingly outstanding performance of homeschoolers. It is the same reason that we don't have mandatory testing of private schools now.

Hehehehe.

And why do public school teachers send their kids to private schools, at twice the rate of the rest of the population? So many mysteries.

145 posted on 03/13/2007 5:42:44 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
How are you giving up a liberty to ask a child to take a test to prove he/she is being taught?

Guilty until proven innocent?

In this case, the child cannot be forced to take a test by the school system. That is the law. You say you are concerned with abuse, but evidently judicial abuse doesn't bother you.

Oh, and have you done anything about those barely literate Bears?

146 posted on 03/13/2007 5:48:16 AM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Compulsory schooling isn't about learning. It never has been.

Sure it was. In the "Old Deluder Satan Law," officially called the Massachusetts Education Law of 1647 established a compulsory education system (every town with 50 families had to hire a teacher; those few towns wit 100 families had to establish a "grammar school" to prepare students to go to Harvard.)

To be sure, the American educational system was influenced by the Prussians - just as our military was. (Clauswitz's On War redefined our military in the 19th century.) Even so, Prussian excesses do not discredit complusary education any more than the Eisenhower Interstate System is discredited by Hitler's autobahn.

147 posted on 03/13/2007 5:51:09 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Got a nasty one liner back in all caps.

The epiphany-of-the-month for me has been, "no one is as dogmatic as a 'free-thinker.'"

148 posted on 03/13/2007 5:52:29 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Personally, given the government's compelling interest to see that children who do not receive the freely provided public education are being educated at home and not being abused, it seems to me to be 100% reasonable to mandate annual standardized testing, an annual individual home instruction plan outlining the curriculum you intend to use, and quarterly progress reports.

I see you've never dealt with a school system as a homeschool parent when the system has the power to force such metrics. In your point of view, the parent must prove to the school that "all is well". Just how does a failed and failing school system warrant such authority?

Perhaps the school should justify to each parent how they are achieving their stated and real aims with the kids. You know - the stated aim of educating (by on large, done poorly) and the real aim of indoctrination (by on large, done exceedingly well).

149 posted on 03/13/2007 5:53:29 AM PDT by MortMan (Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes, let's round up all the HS'd and sew little HS stars on their shirts.


150 posted on 03/13/2007 5:56:04 AM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Drango
Homeschooling is actually in the Oklahoma Constitution...written some 100 years ago.

FWIW-

151 posted on 03/13/2007 5:57:10 AM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

The reductio ad Hitlerum logicla fallacy strikes again.


152 posted on 03/13/2007 6:04:05 AM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk; Fester Chugabrew
He could have meant the Possum Lodge...

http://www.redgreen.com/

153 posted on 03/13/2007 6:04:51 AM PDT by Osage Orange (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Doesn't anyone who supports mandatory testing have a problem with the power it gives the failing public school system over its chief rivals? It'd be like if McDonalds was chosen by the government to certify all other fast food restaurants. And if McDonalds was government run and subsidized and only had two menu choices, both of which were inedible. But we'd better be sure the people over at Burger King are getting healthy food!

What about letting the free market decide whether homeschools or public schools are producing a better product, and keep the government out?


154 posted on 03/13/2007 6:09:11 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Doesn't anyone who supports mandatory testing have a problem with the power it gives the failing public school system over its chief rivals?

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Do you know why we don't have mandatory testing of private schools?

Answer: The government schools workers don't lobby for mandatory private school testing because they don't want to be embarrassed by the poor showing of the government schools.

For the same reason, I doubt that we will see mandatory testing of homeschoolers. The homeschoolers would leave the government school kids in the dust.
155 posted on 03/13/2007 6:37:53 AM PDT by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: jude24

THEE: "and in light of the minimal intrusion into the parent's privacy."

ME: I hope you are making a joke. Given the large, and growing number of cases of AgencyAbusers acting out, all across America, you must be jesting.


156 posted on 03/13/2007 6:39:53 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principles, - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The educational establishment worked overtime to ridicule homeschoolers. Now that homeschooled childre CONSISTENTLY outperform all public school students, teaching establishment seeks to regulated them to death.

It seems this black robed judge is afraid some home school student will grow up to find a awy to eliminate the black robed elitists.

Instead of condemning them, the "poobek skuelz" should seek to immitate them.


157 posted on 03/13/2007 6:50:46 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

If your friend is addicted to snappy one liners, tell him that one of the top climate models (METS model) predicted that in the summer, Ireland and the Central Sahara have the same rainfall.

Betcha that makes him like one liners a tad less. ;-)


158 posted on 03/13/2007 6:55:49 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principles, - -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: wintertime; All

Does anyone have a comparison of sat scores of home schoolers vs private schools vs public schools?

I bet the first two have more college grads and above.


159 posted on 03/13/2007 6:56:43 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Well, I grew up in Pennsylvania, and the routine trouncing that our test scores gave the public schoolers didn't stop the law from requiring tests in 3rd, 5th, and 8th grades.


160 posted on 03/13/2007 7:04:56 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson