Give me a break in the pious nonsense here and you can remove your stain-glassed contact lenses....
The point is that warning the faithful about the "bad example" of the likes of Sean Hannity ought to be so far down the Father's priority list that it should never come up.
We don't need to be warned about Sean Hannity. The big sinners, the sanhedren of paganism....Kennedy, Durbin, Leahy, Chris Matthews, Begala, the state of Massachusetts that is majority catholic but repeatedly elects sodomites like Gary Studds and Barney Frank and abortionist-adulterer-fornicators like Ted Kennedy....THAT is the crowd the padre needs to give public comdemnation to...
But he won't because he's a major COWARD. He would be assaulted and have to take some major persecution and he's obviously too wimpy to risk that.
So, attack polite types, deferential types like Sean Hannity....woooooo Sean is prolife. but here's a flaw !
Also, "artificial" birth control does not have to involve phisycal devices but any SCHEME to INTENTIONALLY REDUCE THE RISK of God granting a blessing of a child is clearly a violation. If Christ says merely looking upon a woman to lust after her (Matt 5:27-30) is ADULTERY, then so is this so-called natural family "planning" nonsense when the clear intention is to avoid children.
It may be your opinion that Natural Family Planning is equivalent to artificial birth control, but that opinion is not shared by anyone in the Magisterium that I'm aware of.
And Fr. Euteneuer has indeed called out Democrats on their support of abortion. See reply #41 for an example.
He also strongly criticized Senate Democrats for their attacks on Samuel Alito's Catholicism.
How is any of that any worse than pledging one's support for a Republican like Rudolph Giuliani, who is every bit as pro-abortion, pro-homosexual and as much an adulterer as those Democrats you just mentioned?