Hannity is way more orthodox than Eutenhaur.
Your demi-god Eutenhaur is the typical Vatican II emasculated priesty boy who sings Kumbaya and performs clown masses. He probably has never said the Tridentine Rite and he is likely homosexual.
Cuty-Euty hasn't gone after anyone. Has he been dragged away from abortion clinics like Randall Terry? Hardly. He has this "brand" and his little website and his smug "Natural Planning" system.
Get a grip on this. His "Natural Planning" is not "Natural" at all. It is based on the most intense science, depends on taking temperatures, charting, significant effort all to AVOID pregnancy. It probably is more effective than condems which he hypocritically condems.
Say everyone were practicing the pink-padre's natural planning nonsense. What would the outcomme be? Fertility rates like Italy and Spain, that's what. Have you read Pat Buchanan's "Death of the West"? Catholic countries are going out of existence giving way to Muslims.
In the meantime, Father insipid Eutenhaur is probably on the bandwagon to cannonize the apostate John Paul II, he of syncretist Assisi fame as he does his clown masses and runs around defiling the blessed sacrament with women crawling all over the sanctuary.
He is a hypocrite of the worst kind. He recommends having no children and disobeys Gods command to multiply. He is a phony and a coward.
More attributing bad motives to other. You have the responsibility to get your facts straight.
The sex abuse problem is just one of the many manifestations of clergymen and members of the hierarchy who have been feminized and lost their courage to both speak the truth and enforce discipline. The fact that the “sins of the fathers” are now being reviewed in front of audiences of millions by lesbian-activist types like Rosie O’Donnell is in itself a real irony, but as Monsignor Ronald Knox used to say, for some people “any stick to beat the Church will do.”
Say everyone were practicing the pink-padre's natural planning nonsense. What would the outcomme be? Fertility rates like Italy and Spain, that's what. Have you read Pat Buchanan's "Death of the West"? Catholic countries are going out of existence giving way to Muslims.
Priests who are silent about the teaching on contraception also forget two very important things: first, priestly vocations generally come from large families. Failure to preach openness to life and generosity with children has a direct effect on how many men will be standing in the trenches with us later on. Contracepting this teaching has the same effect as contracepting the marital act: sterility. The persistent sterility of priestly vocations in the West is caused by priests who are silent about the plague of contraception among the laity and forget that their own vocations are the result of their parents' generosity with life. Overworked priests will be reaping the fruits of their silence on contraception for a long time.
In the meantime, Father insipid Eutenhaur is probably on the bandwagon to cannonize the apostate John Paul II, he of syncretist Assisi fame as he does his clown masses and runs around defiling the blessed sacrament with women crawling all over the sanctuary.
You assume again, and it reveals your sedevacantist position.
He is a hypocrite of the worst kind. He recommends having no children and disobeys Gods command to multiply. He is a phony and a coward.
TIme for your to head to the Confessional. You bear false witness, as the above has demonstrated. Here's a bit more evidence that you smear a good man:
From What is an exorcism?
The Catholic Church has a ritual of exorcism, revised in 1999, that is used by the priest in the performance of an exorcism. An exorcist may also use the ritual that was promulgated in 1614. In my opinion there is not even the slightest comparison of the two—the 1614 ritual is infinitely better.
Fr. Euteneur on the litury (from New Answers)
In the Church, nowhere was this confusion more evident to the average Catholic than in the liturgy. Suddenly altars were turned around to face the people and the vernacular replaced Latin. Some priests began using the Mass as their own platform or even stage, where they and their personalities were on display rather the focus being on the Lord and His Eucharistic Sacrifice. Some placed the “authority” of the so-called “New Morality” above the authority of the Church—namely God and His revealed Word—and we are suffering from that today. Catholics have a right to the Mass the Church gives us, not the improvisations of a given priest.
That the Mass be celebrated properly is vitally important because of the truth of the Latin phrase, "lex orandi, lex credere" — as the Church prays, so it believes. Distortions in the liturgy have created distortions and errors in the beliefs of many Catholics, which we see every day with Catholics who use contraception, Catholic politicians who support abortion and Catholics who vote for them. These Catholics are in grave error, yet defend themselves according to a faulty understanding of what the Church teaches or the error that one can pick and choose what teachings they will follow.
Tribemike, your shilling for Hannity has now passed beyond the absurd into the insane.
Calumny is a mortal sin, generally.
From the Catholic Encyclopedia (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03190c.htm)
Etymologically any form of ruse or fraud employed to deceive another, particularly in judicial proceedings. In its more commonly accepted signification it means the unjust damaging of the good name of another by imputing to him a crime or fault of which he is not guilty. The sin thus committed is in a general sense mortal, just as is detraction. It is hardly necessary, however, to observe that as in other breaches of the law the sin may be venial, either because of the trivial character of the subject-matter involved or because of insufficient deliberation in the making of the accusation. Objectively, a calumny is a mortal sin when it is calculated to do serious harm to the person so traduced. Just as in the instance of wrongful damage to person or estate, so the calumniator is bound to adequate reparation for the injury perpetrated by the blackening of another's good name. He is obliged (1) to retract his false statements, and that even though his own reputation may necessarily as a consequence suffer. (2) He must also make good whatever other losses have been sustained by the innocent party as a result of his libellous utterances, provided these same have been in some measure (in confuso) foreseen by him. In canon law the phrase juramentum calumniae is employed to indicate the oath taken by the parties to a litigation, by which they averred that the action was brought and the defence offered in good faith.