Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Doubtful. If that was the case, the U.S. Supreme Court never would have remanded the case.

That doesn't follow. The SC probably remanded the case so the lower court could dispose of it because Miller never showed.

835 posted on 03/10/2007 12:23:21 PM PST by Texas Federalist (Gingrich '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Federalist
"The SC probably remanded the case so the lower court could dispose of it"

They remanded it, saying they had no idea if the shotgun was useful to a milita. They could go no further in the case.

842 posted on 03/10/2007 12:45:54 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson