Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

I understand that Ruth Bader Ginsberg is with Silberman on this ruling's logic--wouldn't that mean the we would have a slam-dunk at the SCOTUS?


758 posted on 03/10/2007 5:36:39 AM PST by Pharmboy ([She turned me into a] Newt! in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 757 | View Replies ]


To: Pharmboy
"I understand that Ruth Bader Ginsberg is with Silberman on this ruling's logic"

I'd need to see that in writing.

Certainly if SCOTUS rules an individual right, that would be cause for celebration. But it wouldn't change anything.

First, it would apply only to the federal government. Second, Congress can still move forward with legislation like the AWB that's in the House -- even this decision admitted that.

I'd like to see a state bring a suit saying that the federal AWB infringes on the state's ability to form a Militia since the AWB (and the NFA and the GCA) prohibits the very arms they wish their citizens to keep and bear. AND file that suit in the 9th Circuit since they're the ones who are already on record saying the second amendment protects the formation of a state Militia!

Ah, we can only dream.

766 posted on 03/10/2007 5:54:24 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 758 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson