Giuliani already enforced the New York City ugly gun law, which was much more destructive to the second amendment than the Clinton ban. He's been saying that the second amendment is about hunters for years, he recnetly said it again.
One thing that I found startling, after reading the entire decision -- all 75 pages of it, every single word -- is that the contemporaneous documents and words make it obvioust that the Second Amendment IS "about hunting" -- partially (and only partially).
The information included in the decision makes it quite clear that the founders did intent to protect a right to hunt, in addition to the primary rights (defense) protected by the Second.
The animal rights creeps must be having conniptions over this.