Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Interesting. On three fronts: A) The second amendment protects an individual right, B) The second amendment applies to the states, and C) The District of Columbia is a state.
Whew! What's next? Machine guns are arms? Licensing anyone is an infringement? Concealed or open carry is protected under "to bear arms"?

That's really about all they left out.




One can only hope that concealed carry gets the same protection! What an awesome development that would be! Just think, any crook, anywhere, at any time, would no tknow ifhis next victim were packing heat! Now THAT'S a deterrent!

--PP


313 posted on 03/09/2007 11:28:50 AM PST by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies ]


To: VideoPaul

One other point: on pages 57 & 58, the court's opinion upon unreasonable restrictions placed upon Constitutional rights is established against the side of the government and, by extrapolation, may be extended to the unconstitutional CFR law and its unreasonable restrictions.


366 posted on 03/09/2007 12:10:06 PM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson