Bull. Justice Washington, Corfield:
Protection by the government; the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right to acquire and possess property of every kind, and to pursue and obtain happiness and safety;
-snip-
These, and many others which might be mentioned, are, strictly speaking, privileges and immunities,"
Douglass said, "the words "privileges and immunities" comprehend all the rights ... which belong to a person in a state of civil society". (He didn't say, "the words "privileges and immunities" comprehend all the rights ... which belong to a Citizen of a state.)
So? He was defining P&I, not saying how they applied to Article IV or the States.
I listed a whole bunch of those belonging to a person in a state of civil society in an earlier post.
Like the right to travel, and the right to commerce. So you do agree that P&I does include at least some fundamental rights. What evidence do you have that the Founders thought the terms "privileges" and "immunities" did not comprehend fundamental rights?
Are you playing games here? There was no mention of rights in your post #1213 -- that's the one you asked me to comment on.
Now you bring up something else. Screw you. I'm outta here. I'm tired of putting up with your bull$hit and your gotcha games.